Detection rules › Sigma

Possible PetitPotam Coerce Authentication Attempt

Severity
high
Author
Mauricio Velazco, Michael Haag
Source
upstream

Detect PetitPotam coerced authentication activity.

MITRE ATT&CK coverage

TacticTechniques
Credential AccessT1187 Forced Authentication

Event coverage

ProviderEvent IDTitle
Security-Auditing5145A network share object was checked to see whether client can be granted desired access.

Stages and Predicates

Stage 1: selection

RelativeTargetName: lsarpc
ShareName|endswith: '\IPC$'
ShareName|startswith: '\\\\'
SubjectUserName: 'ANONYMOUS LOGON'

Indicators

Each row is a field, operator, and value that the rule matches. The corpus column counts how many other rules in the catalog look for the same combination: high numbers point to widely-used, community-vetted indicators. Blank or 1 shows that the indicator is specific to this rule.

FieldKindValues
RelativeTargetNameeq
  • lsarpc corpus 3 (sigma 2, splunk 1)
ShareNameends_with
  • \IPC$
ShareNamestarts_with
  • \\\\
SubjectUserNameeq
  • ANONYMOUS LOGON corpus 3 (sigma 3)

Neighbors

Broader alternatives (more inclusive than this rule)

These rules match a superset of what this rule catches. They cover the same events plus more. Use them if you want wider coverage and can absorb more false positives.